Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 01:57

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Belmont Stakes 2025: Win, place, show, exacta, trifecta and superfecta picks - SportsLine
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Harvard gastroenterologist shares 4 bloat-busting tricks that actually work - Times of India
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Danny Boyle Says He Couldn’t Make ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ Today - Yahoo News UK
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
There’s another leak on the ISS, but NASA is not saying much about it - Ars Technica
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Capitol agenda: Thune heads into a perilous vote-a-rama - Politico
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
European probe snaps first images of the sun's south pole - NBC News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What measures can companies take to overcome the global talent shortage in IT outsourcing?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.